Sovereign AI Audit
A paid diagnostic that maps current AI use, data exposure, governance gaps, and the practical route to policy, hybrid architecture, or private infrastructure.
Sovereign AI · Board-level technology counsel
When AI becomes a board risk, the answer is not another SaaS account.
Consilium advises family offices, private firms, and scaling companies on language-model systems they can actually govern.
We map where sensitive data travels, decide what should remain sovereign, and design the path from uncontrolled AI use to auditable capability.
What we do
Private AI strategy for organizations where leakage is existential.
Most firms already use AI. Few can explain which data enters which models, under whose authority, with what audit trail, and under which jurisdiction. Consilium makes that visible, then designs the control layer.
Architecture Counsel
Board-readable technical strategy: model routing, private RAG, identity-aware retrieval, audit logs, data residency, and build-versus-buy decisions.
Implementation Design
When the answer is to build, Consilium designs the system and The Code Jeweller welds it: private inference, retrieval, access control, monitoring, and operational handoff.
Who it is for
Principals and operators who cannot outsource judgment to procurement.
Best fit
- Family offices with document-heavy operations and private staff.
- Law, wealth, finance, security, medical, and advisory firms handling confidential material.
- Scale-ups where AI adoption has outrun board governance.
- HNW principal-led companies preparing for regulation, diligence, or institutional scrutiny.
Wrong fit
- Teams looking for a generic chatbot.
- Buyers who want free discovery before defining the risk.
- Organizations that need public case studies before signing an NDA.
- Companies whose real requirement is speed at any cost.
The first engagement
The Sovereign AI Audit.
A one-week paid diagnostic. It does not assume you need a private stack. Sometimes the right answer is policy. Sometimes it is hybrid routing. Sometimes it is owned infrastructure. The audit exists to tell the difference.
Exposure map
Which tools are used, which data classes are touched, who has authority, and where model traffic travels.
Control gap memo
Access control, logging, vendor, jurisdiction, staff behavior, EU AI Act and GDPR exposure.
Decision recommendation
Do nothing, lock down behavior, build hybrid, or build sovereign. One page. No hedging.
How it works
No funnel theatre. No sensitive data before the room is protected.
Mutual NDA
The first document is not a proposal. It is the boundary.
Paid diagnostic
Two to three sessions. Current tooling, data classes, workflows, governance, and regulatory exposure.
Board-readable recommendation
A clear decision: policy, hybrid, sovereign stack, or no action. If nothing should be built, we say that.
Implementation path
If the decision requires engineering, The Code Jeweller builds under Consilium architecture.
The firm that names clients is telling you how it treats secrets.
Contact
Start with the boundary.
Send only enough context to establish fit. No confidential material by email. If the problem belongs here, the next step is a mutual NDA and a short fit call.